Preface to the lecture:

Electromagnetic Environmental Compatibility

Preface to the lecture:

Electromagnetic Environmental Compatibility, K. Meyl, 1996

     The theme encloses the electromagnetic compatibility of both 
technical and biological systems. Only part of the electromagnetic 
wave can be considered for function troubles, namely the part that was 
absorbed and has rolled up to a vortex. The activity depends on the 
number of created vortices and of their lifetime, their decay.
The eddy current only manifests in conducting materials. In the 
air and in dielectric materials on the other hand the vortex of the 
electric field will form, also called the potential vortex. To 
calculate and to measure this vortex is our goal.
     First we'll carry out a survey of the problems and the usual 
methods. From the analysis of unsolved problems the need for the 
introduction of the new vortex phenomena is deducted and an adequate 
field-theoretical approach will be chosen. Afterwards the potential 
vortices are calculated and their properties are discussed and 
interpreted.
     For the purpose of proving their existence, on the one hand the 
Schrodinger equation will be derived and on the other hand the quantum 
properties of the most important elementary particles will be 
calculated and compared with the well-known measured values. 
Measurement and calculation are in excellent agreement for weight, 
charge, magnetic moment and spin. So the theory not only proofs its 
correctness, in addition it demonstrates it can achieve much more. The 
theory takes us to the unification of the well-known interactions and 
physical phenomena and shows itself as a unified theory.
     In the practical conversion and usage of the theory there will not 
only be informed but by all means also be provoked as an entrance in a 
fruitfully discussion. Fundamental questions will be taken up like: 
What is information, energy, temperature or smell? The connection to 
the theme of the electromagnetic environmental compatibility is formed 
by the technical and the biological usage of the potential vortices, 
the energy transmission of Nikola Tesla exactly like the in a similar 
way functioning nerve conduction. Here we already can expect 
biological reactions.

     This lecture was held for the first time in the winter semester of 
1995/96. It will not deliver ready recipes or instructions. The goal 
is reached when the critical sense of the listeners and readers has 
been inspired and discussions have been set going. Everybody has to 
draw the consequences out of such a theory by him- or herself.
In addition to this lecture a seminar is offered, wherein several 
themes are supplemented or deepened, different theories are compared 
and possible consequences are discussed. The appearance of an edition 
belonging to the seminar has started in 1998. Regarding the conversion 
of consequences both politicians and scientists are equally addressed, 
because the electromagnetic environmental compatibility has developed 
to one of the most urgent problems of today's world. But in last 
consequence all of us bury the worldwide responsibility for our 
environment.

Introduction
     Here the extremely controversially discussed question of the 
environmental compatibility of electromagnetic fields will be 
persuaded. Limits should inform what is incompatible and what is 
compatible. But there are as many limits as there are commissions and 
specialists. And besides that differ the results from each other for 
several powers of ten. In course of time the legitimate doubts become 
unmistakable and the representatives of science slowly get to feel the 
burden of proof.
     For the sake of efficiency, the actual discussion concerning the 
theme of electro-smog is analyzed and the necessity to involve until 
now an unnoticed field phenomenon in the discussion about limits is 
derived: It concerns vortices of the electric field. These potential 
vortices, as they are called, have the corresponding properties to show 
biological effects even at the lowest field strengths. In any case it 
is not possible to exclude that at present the wrong physical phenomena 
are measured and made responsible.

A parable should bring clarity.
     Lets imagine that the to us well-known and over our sense of touch 
understandable physical phenomenon of the temperature is unknown to us, 
neither measurable nor perceptible. Our weather station only exists of 
a barometer that could show us the air pressure and deliver us 
indications if good or bad weather is to be feared. 
     We ready realize that there exists a connection between the air 
pressure and our health and make the to us well-known phenomenon 
responsible. When the pointer points to good weather we can go out 
lightly dressed. With bad weather we should take a coat, so we know 
from experience.
     Now we imagine the realistic situation that in winter we have a 
weather situation of high pressure but it's stone-cold outside. The 
weather station will display high temperatures with the result that 
some people will walk around with short-sleeved and open shirt, only to 
lie in bed with a cold in the evening. Of course the air pressure was 
to blame! Logically the "pressure sensitive," as they are called 
mockingly, demand the limits for the allowed pressure to be reduced so 
far that no consequences for health are to be feared. Concerning the 
theme of allowed limits, science is asked and science proceeds in a 
systematic way: the pressure is investigated in the laboratory, 
isolated from all other parameters and so it is discovered that man 
catches no cold even at a substantially higher air pressure, so there 
is no reason to alter the limits. 
     Actually we would expect these at any time reproducible results to 
have a calming effect on the minds of the participants of the 
discussion and on the population. Instead the pressure sensitives time 
and again cite new knowledge that won't fit in the scheme. So is for 
instance stated that draught causes the same health problems although 
this pseudo effect has nothing at all to do with the air pressure. So 
owing to incomprehensibility and emotions the discussion about limits 
becomes a farce.

     The fact that sensitive people react to effects of air electricity 
and possibly get ill without proof that some today measurable physical 
quantities are responsible should make us think. It is little calming 
watching our scientists poking at the dense fog whereas at the same 
time among the runners of the new telecommunication networks there 
spreads something like a gold-digger mood. 
     To introduce a new technology is not difficult, but to abolish it 
for reasons of the electromagnetic environmental compatibility is 
almost impossible! 


'Some important claims to the creation of an up-to-date environmental policy in view of the probable existence of longitudinal electromagnetic energy waves'

1. Instruments must be developed and built with which the energy waves can be measured;

2. All existing technical apparatus should be tested regarding the emission of energy waves;

3. Only such transmitters with antennas that emit a minimum of energy waves should be brought into service;

4. The ability of biological systems to absorb electromagnetic energy waves must be determined. To that also belongs the question, how many vortices collect locally and how fast they fall apart;

5. Limits for the allowed pressure developed by artificially produced energy waves should be fixed, regulations and laws enacted;

6. The energy waves available in nature should be brought to a technical use, with the goal of a natural energy production.

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl